The new Acting Director of the Minerals Management Service (MMS), Bob Abbey, fired an environmental whistleblower, Earle Dixon, in a previous job with BLM. Dixon had complained about lax environmental standards. Here's a link to the settlement with Dixon. Let's hope it was an aberration. Regardless, interesting choice in the wake of the current oil spill ... .
Thoughts about risk, insurance, terrorism, disasters, public policy, and other things that interest me
Showing posts with label Oil spill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oil spill. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Monday, May 10, 2010
Deepwater Horizon potential cause of spill
USGS Fact Sheet FS–021–01 dated March 2001, Natural Gas Hydrates—Vast Resource, Uncertain Future, in part, states that “[g]as hydrates represent a hazard to conventional oil and gas production. In the Gulf of Mexico, oil and gas exploration is extending into water depths where gas hydrates occur at the sea floor. Pumping hot oil from great depths through drill pipes can cause warming of sediments and dissociation of hydrate, liberating large amounts of methane, weakening sediments, and perhaps generating pockets of highly pressured gas. The result might be gas blowouts, loss of support for pipelines, and sea-floor failure that could lead to underwater landslides and the release of methane from hydrates.”
Perhaps the exothermic reaction of the concrete (i.e., the curing process) intended to cap the exploratory well helped trigger the formation of an enormous methane bubble that was ignited at the surface and triggered the cascading events that led to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The naturally-occuring (at depths below about 600 meters) methane clathrate hydrate would have been stable at the high pressure and cold temperature of the Gulf bottom. However, if this pressure was reduced or the temperature was increased (via, for example, the concrete curing), the methane hydrate would potentially "melt," and its trapped methane gas would rise and expand immensely.
It's interesting that a comprehensive risk analysis that explored this and other potential scenaria and their expected consequences wasn't required as part of the deepwater oil exploration permitting process.
Posted by
Unknown
at
Monday, May 10, 2010
Labels:
Gulf of Mexico,
Methane,
Natural gas,
Oil spill,
Seabed
0
Comments
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)